Gender Differences in Leadership Essay Example for Free

Gender Differences in Leadership Essay1. What argon the strongest points of the story? What do you consider ar its main contributions to the theatre of global people management?The radical itself has a very interesting purpose with the look question of whether women leaders are really incompatible from men leaders. The paper gives a very good introduction in particular giving the literature review in order to get familiar with some basic knowledge on the payoff of gender differences in leadership. The review focus combination of sort outs and cultural differences stresses out well a tender viewpoint of the problem, which has not been discussed that widely in prior research. in addition the introduction of the new notion stereotype threat, which actually might be viewed as a partly solution for women sometimes performing not as well as they possibly could is an interesting point for management issues in reality. provided the strongest points of the paper are eviden t. The introduction of the new concept of three paradigms gender-blind view, gender-conscious view and that perception creates reality are not only the strongest points of the paper, but in my opinion can also be considered as contributions to the field of global people management. This new paradigms could possibly change the perception of companies, maybe companies will use the beak of the three paradigms to analyse their own structures and be able to improve situations for women, giving them more(prenominal) possibilities.2. What are the weakest points of the paper? (E.g. What arguments are not strong enough? What is not clear? What is missing?)Potential drawbacks are that paradigms are introduced, but not sufficiently discussed within. Also the paper gives good examples where they can be found, it could show more proof for their existence apart from summarising and drawing them together from old watch overings. Also the paper does not find a good way how to manage diversity an d to capture it. It does not manage the combination of cost-efficient coordination and senility to local cultures. Likewise the paper focuses on only two firms, Fuel and Excel, which are very different in how they fill out the paradigms. In my opinion two firms are not enough, more firms should be reviewed for example in a questionnaire in order to give more accommodate for the findings. Correspondingly the paper does not involve a focus on multinational firms, which is very alpha not to leave out in times of globalization. The last criticism is that the paper is unable to purpose its paper purpose question what is the real difference between men and women in leadership.3. How could the author make the paper better?When writing the literature review the could build up the research papers and the gained knowledge chronologically and not going back and forth in the research dates. As the paper is missing some numbers, the technique of hypothesis could have been used, a bigger num ber of companies questioned in survey style as then a quantitative analysis would exist as separate for whether the problem exists in real life and whether paradigms can be implied in the general management world. Also the point of view of women on this topic would be very interesting and more expedient. How do women observe the gender different initiatives, what would they like as support? Also the paper as already mentioned should include a focus on multinational firms and include those in a study.