Module 3: Drug Essay

Are drug companies that test data-based drugs in distant countries acting honestly? In my opinion, a lot of people in foreign countries are uneducated and therefore, may non fully rede the risks, complications and side effects of these experimental drugs. If they do not have the means to adequately research the drug prior to testing it, they may closedown up doing so without fully empathizeing what potential side effects are involved. I am not sure how well companies educate these foreign countries and or people involved in the persona study. If these people are not educated properly than it is unethical for them to test experimental drugs on them. Is the Statesn industry at too much risk of lawsuits to remain competitive? Should companies move to develop drugs be given immunity from lawsuits? The American industry is at risk for lawsuits. I believe people treat now days for almost anything. However, it is not too much of a risk to remain competitive.America is one of the richest countries in the world. I come up China is our biggest competition. We must continue to advance our technology, enhance our products and serve and look for newly ideas and inventions in order to remain competitive. There leave behind always be a risk of lawsuits but I do not feel is would stop us from being competitive. Companies trying to develop drugs should not be given immunity from lawsuits. I know that by developing and inventing new drugs, companies are trying to remain competitive and find cures or medicines to help people. However, some of the side effects that are related to these drugs are horrendous and can cause permanent damage. I also guess that most side effects are disclosed to people who take these new drugs however not all side effects are known with these new drugs and some of them can lead to death. It may not be the companys intention to cause death or some different serious deficiency but it happens and when it does, the individual should have to right to sue for medical related exist and pain and suffering. Is it ethical for companies to decline to cuckold a useful drug because they can work on much specie marketing drugs that are more widely needed? Is it ethical for companies to decline to dispense a useful drug in a foreign domain because they can make more money marketing the drug elsewhere? I personally feel that it is neither ethical nor unethical for a company to decline to sell a useful drug just because they can make more money marketing drugs that are more widely needed.It really is up to the company what drugs they want to sellhowever if a drug is usable that go forth help people and or cure disease, it should be made available and companies should sell it. From a business stand point I can understand why they would want to market only drugs that are more widely needed as it will make them more money however by offering or selling drugs that are useful, they will rasetually gain more recognition and t hat could lead to a competitive advantage. As for whether or not it is ethical for companies to decline selling a useful drug in a foreign country because they can make more money marketing the drug elsewhere, I am again neither in agreement or disagreement on this one. It is a companys chose where and to whom they want to sell drugs to. However, in poor countries, people cannot easily afford anything. Companies would have to reduce their price significantly even by selling in bulk. If they sell to China or other countries that can afford the drugs, I am sure they would do so but they also risk losing money.Do companies have an ethical obligation to make drugs available in poor countries at teentsy or no cost? I personally feel that companies do not have an ethical obligation to make drugs available in poor countries at little or no cost. I certainly can understand that people in other countries have it very hard. A lot of people have little or no money and can barely afford to fee d their family and or children let alone(predicate) afford health care and or drugs. However, by making drugs available at little to no cost, people will be able to sell it and use it illegally creating an even bigger problem. plenty will smuggle it into the United States as they do now with street drugs. It is unfortunate that people with heartfelt intentions who will use the drugs and or medication for what it is prescribe for have to suffer because of those people whose intentions are not so good. Those free and or lost cost drugs will be another way for criminals to make money. I do not think it is a good idea nor do I feel that companies have any type of moral or ethical obligation to do this.